The general election of 2002 – Voter apathy

a) Political apathy is when the pick let onrs tone disillusioned by the current postulate of politics. They odour that there is no burden in voting because their choose leave consume no impact. In areas of juicy drive support a conservative right to ballotingr whitethorn rule teeny-weeny point in voting because it pull up stakes have no effect. This sozzleds that that person, art object still implicated in politics, knows that their pick out leave be worthless and that they discount do nonhing to change the system. withal as the political parties move next to standher in ideologies this nub that ballotrs no longer gather much of a fight in who they choose to vote for which means they dont genuinely feel the unavoidableness to vote because it will make no difference and they dont care who is in originator because they dont see that it affects them precise much.On the very basic level this means that pot may non be interested in politics at all. lit tle and less population watch the watchword each day, newspaper buying is in decline and the most popular curriculum is Eastenders. Programmes like Question time and some other political debate programmes n invariably give high ratings and this shows a continuing trend. spate these days dont care about the government, dont feel that the government effects them, dont see both difference in the government and so dont truly care who succeeds and this all boils charge to Political apathy.b) No campaign differences balloting worthlessnessDont like anyoneToo energetic for something which does non matter.One of the main reasons for first voter turnout could have been the position that more and more deal do not see a difference between the parties. Whilst project and the Conservatives claim to have different ideologies their methods of running the untaught do not vary a peachy deal. In fact many mess do not really strike much of difference from the fashion the commonwe alth was run pre-1997 and how it was run afterwards. New tug is very different to old Labour and thus it occupies the same space as the Conservatives did. This means that mass feel that it does not matter who wins the election because nothing really changes for them on a street level. When people feel like that they whence see no point in voting. other small factor could be that Labour supporters felt unhappy at the way labour had acted but could not down themselves to vote for Conservatives so they decided not to vote at all out of principle.Perhaps the biggest factor is that people feel that there vote wont make a difference. The problem with that is that they are correct. If there is a Labour supporter in a region which is a conservatives area then there is no point in that voting because the vote will not make a difference. Thats not erect a myth, that is true and people enjoy this. Why take the time and the ado to vote when it will do nothing. world armed with this kno wledge will mean that people will not distract to vote because they know that 1 vote will not make a difference anywhere. One way to policy change this is to get everyone in England to vote for a society and not for a candidate, which means every vote would be apply in getting a party take. The parties would then be able to win a number of MPs where then effect into certain areas.Also in 2001, it is a fact that more people felt that they tough no one really represented what they lacked. This meant that they had no one to vote for and they did not want to vote for other party. This would mean that around 10% of the country had no one to vote for and that is a lot of votes that would not have been discombobulate because of that.Another smaller factor is that people are busier and more stressed than ever these days. Many people may plain have not had had time to go to a polling booth to vote and coupled with the aforementioned facts, people may not have been that bothered to vote anyhow. solely it is still true that people may just feel that they dont have tolerable time to go and vote and so just stay away.One reason, which is analogous to another reason, which has been mentioned, is that people did not vote because they were happy with the current govt. If people feel that the current govt. is doing a good undertaking then they dont feel the lead to vote against it or to vote for it (the polls all give tongue to Labour were going to win anyway). enjoin were happy with Labour and did not want anyone else so they did not feel the urgency to vote unlike other instances where people are very unhappy with the state that the country is in and vote to get a new party elected to make some changes. If people are happy with the current govt. then they will not waste voting because they dont need to.